Understanding Social Scoring: Risks and Implications

Social scoring is a system that uses AI and data analysis to assign a numerical value or ranking to individuals based on their social behavior, personal characteristics, or interactions.

In the context of AI strategy and the EU AI Act discussions, social scoring is classified as an unacceptable risk because it uses data from one part of a person’s life to penalize or reward them in an entirely unrelated area.

---

1. How Social Scoring Works

A social scoring system typically follows a three-step cycle:

1. Data Ingestion: Massive amounts of data are collected from diverse sources—social media activity, financial transactions, criminal records, “internet of things” (IoT) sensors, and even minor social infractions (like jaywalking or late utility payments).
2. Algorithmic Processing: AI models process this “behavioral data” to identify patterns of “trustworthiness” or “social standing.”
3. Consequence Assignment: The resulting score is used to grant or deny access to essential services. A high score might mean cheaper insurance or faster visa processing; a low score could lead to being barred from high-speed trains, certain jobs, or even specific schools for one’s children.

---

2. Global Perspectives & Examples

The implementation of social scoring varies wildly depending on the regulatory environment.

• China’s Social Credit System: The most prominent example. It is a government-led initiative designed to regulate social behavior. It tracks “trustworthiness” in economic and social spheres. Punishments for low scores can include “blacklisting” from luxury travel or public shaming.
• Private Sector (The West): While “nationwide” social scoring is rare in the West, “platform-based” scoring is common. For example:
  • Uber/Airbnb: Use two-way rating systems. If your “guest score” drops too low, you are de-platformed.
  • Financial Credit Scores: While technically different, modern credit models are increasingly looking at “alternative data” (like utility bill payments) which moves them closer to the territory of social scoring.

---

3. The Regulatory “Hard Line” (EU AI Act)

As we discussed regarding the EU AI Act, social scoring is strictly prohibited under Article 5. The law bans systems that:

• Evaluate or classify people based on social behavior or personality traits.
• Lead to detrimental treatment in social contexts unrelated to where the data was originally collected.
• Apply treatment that is disproportionate to the behavior (e.g., losing access to social benefits because of a minor traffic fine).

Strategic Distinction: Traditional credit scoring (predicting loan repayment) is generally not considered prohibited social scoring as long as it stays within the financial domain and follows high-risk transparency rules. It becomes “social scoring” when your “repayment behavior” is used by the government to decide if you’re allowed to enter a public park.

---

4. Risks & Ethical “Interest”

Social scoring creates a unique form of “Societal Technical Debt”:

• Loss of Autonomy: People begin to self-censor and “perform” for the algorithm rather than acting authentically.
• Bias Amplification: If the training data is biased (e.g., tracking “social behavior” in marginalized neighborhoods more heavily), the score becomes a tool for systemic discrimination.
• Privacy Erosion: To be accurate, these systems require total surveillance, effectively ending the concept of a private sphere.

---

How this affects your AI Strategy:

If you are solutioning AI for HR, Finance, or Customer Service, you must ensure your systems do not inadvertently “drift” into social scoring.